Welcome back to What If. This week, we focus on 2 teams in
the Westerlands, the 1st division eliminated from playoff
contention. We all know what a mess the Westerlands were this year. The
division winner finished .500 (below .500 if you count the playoff loss), and
the better part of the division was in full rebuild mode by week 8. But what if
things didn’t go that direction?
House Clegane
Background- After
week 7, House Clegane was sitting at 3-4, 2-1 in their division, with 661.79
points (~33 behind the division leader). Before week 7, he made a blockbuster
move to get Antonio Brown from a sweepstakes run by the Iron Bank. Prior to
week 8, he made moves to acquire Thomas Rawls, Big Ben, and the Denver
backfield. He also made several moves to begin building for the future. For
this what if, we’ll examine what would have happened if Clegane would have gone
for the Westerlands title this year, instead of blowing things up. Unlike my
previous post, I’m looking at a roster that technically didn’t exist as the
deal for Rawls happened after the deal sending Flacco away. I’m proceeding with
the assumption that Clegane having Flacco on his roster wouldn’t have been
enough to change the result of that deal
Roster pool- QB:
Cousins, Flacco; RB: Rawls, Kelley, Richard, Riddick, Smallwood; WR: A. Brown,
Landry, Conley, Roberts; TE: Ertz, Witten.
Actual results:
0-7, 241.43 points, missed playoffs
Projected results:
4-3, 585.31 points, wins Westerlands division and #4 seed, wins round 1 matchup vs. Swann, loses
matchup vs Sand Snakes in round 2.
Summary: Propped
up by the Cousins explosion, the breakout of Kelley and the triumphant return
of Rawls, Clegane makes the playoffs by winning the Westerlands. In addition,
he would have scored an impressive 142.83 points in his round 1 matchup vs.
Swann, which, in addition to his 10 point division winner bonus, would have
given him a very impressive win and the top score of the wild card round. His
luck would have run out against Sand Snakes, as Le’veon Bell’s explosive
performance would have counted Clegane among his many victims. So, by just
missing out on cashing, one could make the argument that Clegane did the
pragmatic thing beginning to rebuild his team.
House Banefort
Background-
Everyone’s favorite trade partner, but only if you’re fast enough to snap
accept before the revoke. Banefort was one of the more active owners in trade
discussions, but didn’t get as many done likely due to his revokes, leading to
the phrase “baneforting” someone by offering then revoking. This approach
served him well post draft as he accumulated an impressive collection of
talent. However, he ran into trouble when he over-consolidated that talent for
elite players, that left him no depth to be able to build out a starting
lineup. He had some high scoring weeks when his 4 studs went off, but lost
enough games when one had a tough week that he was a seller of those assets by
the end of the season. For this what if, I’m stopping the clock after his Sept
5th trade, where he acquired Trevor Simean for Matt Jones.
Roster Pool- QB:
Wentz, Simean, RB: Gurley, Johnson, West, Hyde, WR: Meredith, Goodwin, Cooks,
T. Williams, DHB, TE: H Henry, V McDonald
Actual results:
3-11, 951.58 points, missed playoffs
Projected results:
9-5, 1392.66 points, wins Westerlands division and #3 seed. Defeats House
Santagar in round 1, defeats House Targaryen in round 2, facing Sand Snakes for Fire conference title.
Summary- If the
what if of The Iron Bank last week was “quit while you’re ahead,” then House
Banefort has learned to know what your limits are. In his consolidation deals
for Cam and Gronk, he gave up much of the depth that he needed to field a
competitive roster. In his defense, many of these players (e.g., Meredith,
Williams, West, Henry) were pre-breakout and Cam & Gronk represented major
competitive advantages at QB2 and TE. But by acquiring those studs, Banefort
pushed himself from a conference championship team, to the 1.06 in next year's draft, a pick which he
hasn’t owned since the startup.
That’s all for this week. Next week we’ll take a closer look
at a few Ice conference teams and what could have been.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.